11/8/2023 0 Comments Xnview mp vs classicThe basic drop/draw/rotate tools all work well. I like the additional exif display but find some parts of the file/user operations a but clumsy. tgz (that's zipped standalone portable version if you're a windows user) WRT XnViewMP, as a linux user I appreciate the cross-platform nature and either a package file or fully working. However as a linux user it does have the overhead of needing to run under Wine - which it does almost impeccably apart from a glitch in the thumbnail view which requires the installation of a venerable dll from 2001 - which itself limits one to using Wine 2.1 - nothing newer.įaststone has a number of user customisations for mouse and keyboard which I find very useful as they do speed up long view/culling sessions. The batch resize tool has been handy for customising my icon theme and you can even use FS as a poor man's Powerpoint with the draw tool and slideshow creator. I curate photos for our local U3A photo groups and find the multiple search and replace features in the file renaming tool a real bonus. You do need to adjust the RAW settings to get past working on the embedded jpeg - but TBH I have only used that very occasionally. I am a long time user of FastStone and find that for both RAW and JPEG editing it provides 99.9% of all my needs. How do Faststone and XnViewMP compare from a feature and performance standpoint? I often hear that XnViewMP would be a better match for my needs. Works well for me, except that while it is "color aware", it is not "color managed". I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |